Most of these major news sources are the MSM as people call it didn't mention the fact that Hezbollah started firing rockets on us into the civilian population while we were busy killing supposed Lebanese civilians which turned out to be Hezbollah members who had funerals wrapped in Hezbollah flags. So that their readers and viewers started to really really hate us over the last couple of months yeah it's something to chew on but it's not something to swallow. Great article thanks for putting it out there
Thank you very much, Robert. You are absolutely right — they are shaping a reality in which, after reading articles where Hamas is absent, people begin to hate Jews, burn synagogues, and attack them. And after reading such endorsements, a blind hatred toward Trump begins, after which people start thinking about him more than about their friends and family. This obsession leads to a dangerous sympathy for dictatorships, which then step in to explain to the reader about the “evil and backward” West, supposedly consumed by “fascism,” and people begin to hate themselves.
What are you using for fact checking and baselining of the narrative? Eg. They present Hamas as resistance vs terror group. We know which one it is. How does your tool know?
What are you using for fact checking and baselining of the narrative? Eg. They present Hamas as resistance vs terror group. We know which one it is. How does your tool know?
Most of these major news sources are the MSM as people call it didn't mention the fact that Hezbollah started firing rockets on us into the civilian population while we were busy killing supposed Lebanese civilians which turned out to be Hezbollah members who had funerals wrapped in Hezbollah flags. So that their readers and viewers started to really really hate us over the last couple of months yeah it's something to chew on but it's not something to swallow. Great article thanks for putting it out there
Thank you very much, Robert. You are absolutely right — they are shaping a reality in which, after reading articles where Hamas is absent, people begin to hate Jews, burn synagogues, and attack them. And after reading such endorsements, a blind hatred toward Trump begins, after which people start thinking about him more than about their friends and family. This obsession leads to a dangerous sympathy for dictatorships, which then step in to explain to the reader about the “evil and backward” West, supposedly consumed by “fascism,” and people begin to hate themselves.
What are you using for fact checking and baselining of the narrative? Eg. They present Hamas as resistance vs terror group. We know which one it is. How does your tool know?
You don’t need to repeat your question. Thanks
Sometimes it lags and does that.
Please delete first message here
What are you using for fact checking and baselining of the narrative? Eg. They present Hamas as resistance vs terror group. We know which one it is. How does your tool know?
From the Foreign Terrorist Organization, FTO (US)
I meant in general, not for that specific example.
It checks the different lists and says which ones designate them as terrorists
Forget the terrorism example. I meant for everything. Did you manage to compile authoritive sources for every topic to do this?
Unfortunately, I cannot publicly disclose information related to intellectual property
Then unfortunately your project doesnt have an objective basis. Post Modernist world will simply ignore it and move on.
Calling them out on it will just yield more pseudoarguments based on their own definitions.
Its like we're different people now, until the time that an authority that everyone yields to will enforce the issue.
Im not sure there is such a thing as objective truth globally, but at least you may want to gather the US definitions and pose it from that side.